I generally don't like to go to theaters to watch movies, for two reasons, one, i don't like to waste three hours in the dark hall, two, i start crying if there is any emotional scene going on. After a very long time unanimously the team planned to go for a movie, the options were either "2012" or "Tum mile". Most of us were ready for 2012, unfortunately the hall was booked for the next one week and without choice we had to go for "Tum mile".
I am not a fan of Imraan Hashmi, or Soha Ali Khan. The movie was shooted in CAPE TOWN, i was thinking how much money these film makers spend for just a three hours movie and pay Indian currency to other countries, where as i know similar location is present in India and i am proud to live in this city, Visakhapatnam has got its natural beauty like cape town, Hilly roads beside the sea, Sea coast, Ramanaidu film Studio, on the top of the hill, you name the location and Vizag has it, so why go to South Africa, when we have every thing in INDIA?
2 comments:
mast hai...so true
Actually I would have to disagree on this one. Having been to both places I must say Cape Town is much more beautiful. Places like Waterfront cannot be found in India for sure.
Plus Cape town is the perfect blend of comfort and luxury in the midst of scenic beauty...In Vizag, you won’t get the comfort and luxury
Post a Comment